I’ve gotten a lot of questions about how lawsuits against architects work in the past.
For example, what happens when a consultant, like a structural engineer, makes an error which leads to significant monetary losses for the owner.
The owner will sue the architect, because their agreement is with the architect, not the engineer. However, the engineer will get pulled into the suit through subrogation.
Subrogation is a fancy word I just had a PM training meeting about and I thought I would go ahead and pass along that information here. You can get an overview of this word below: Subrogation Definition
You can also read more about Subrogation on page 1052 and in the index on pages 1136-1137 of the “Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice”.
Hope this helps!