Hi can you clarify this answer in the case study? According to the case study the basement must also be considered as scope of the work based on the clients needs as well as the other choices?
So is this like the best answer cause you can’t choose the cafeteria?
Not sure if I get this answer’s explanation.
The university has requested that the architect and general contractor review ideas for decreasing project costs. The architect and general contractor are reviewing value engineering options for the proposed dormitories.
Which of the following items would best decrease the cost of the project and maintain the university’s design intent?
Remove two laundry rooms; provide laundry on floors 1, 3 and 5
Incorrect. Removing two laundry rooms would not be a significant cost savings.
Remove the clouded area on the floor plans on every floor
Incorrect. Although removing the clouded area on all floors would be a significant cost savings, it would not align with the university’s intent to provide a cafeteria in every dorm building.
Remove two kitchenettes; provide kitchenettes on floors 1, 3 and 5
Incorrect. Removing two kitchenettes would not be a significant cost savings.
Remove the basement from dormitories
Correct. Removing the basement would provide a significant cost savings in foundations alone.
Reference: The Architect’s Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th edition, Chapters 9 and 10